2017 Results
The Great Colleges to Work for Survey was conducted by ModernThink in the Spring of 2017. All full and part-time employees (including adjunct faculty) were invited to participate in the survey. There were 1,385 surveys sent with a total of 467 responses (34%). The full data set has all 467 responses included. The extracted data set has 269 responses included (the biggest exclusion is adjunct faculty). The extracted data set is used to compare to benchmarks because the data is similar to in job category to the comparative institutions. Topline results are shown below.
Executive Summary 2017 – Describes the sample and response rate, gives overview and comparison between the 2014 and 2017 data, and measures progress toward the strategic plan benchmarks; find highest and lowest ratings
2014-2017 UT_Comparative – Shows UT’s Full Data for 2014 and 2017 and the difference for every question and benchmark
Benchmark ScoreCard – Shows UT’s Full Data, Extracted Data and the Benchmarks for 2017 Carnegie Public Baccalaureate, 2017 Carnegie Baccalaureate, and 2014 Honor Roll 3,000-9,999
Topline Results by Job Category Full Data – Shows UT’s Full Data by Category and Job Category (Administration, Faculty, Exempt Staff, Non-Exempt Staff, and Adjunct Faculty)
Topline Results by Job Category Extracted Data – Shows UT’s Full Data by Category and Job Category (Administration, Faculty, Exempt Staff, Non-Exempt Staff, and Adjunct Faculty)
Question results by School (Academics) – Shows UT’s Full Data by Question and by Academic School or Department (Business & Accounting, Communication & Media Studies, Education, FSHD & IDAS, Nursing & Dental Hygiene, Exercise Science & HCDT, English, Criminal Justice & Psychology & Sociology, Biology, Physics, Math, CIT/CS, The Arts)
2014 Results
The Great Colleges to Work for Survey was conducted by ModernThink in the Spring of 2014. All full and part-time employees (including adjunct faculty) were invited to participate in the survey. There were 1,047 surveys sent with a total of 495 responses (47%). The full data set has all 495 responses included. The extracted data set has 430 responses included (the biggest exclusion is adjunct faculty). The extracted data set is used to compare to benchmarks because the data is similar to in job category to the comparative institutions. Topline results are shown below.
Benchmark ScoreCard – Shows UT’s Full Data, Extracted Data and the Benchmarks for 2014 Carnegie Public Baccalaureate, 2014 Carnegie Baccalaureate, and 2014 Honor Roll 3,000-9,999
Topline Results by Job Category Full Data – Shows UT’s Full Data by Category and Job Category (Administration, Faculty, Exempt Staff, Non-Exempt Staff, and Adjunct Faculty)
Topline Results by Job Category Extracted Data – Shows UT’s Extracted Data by Category and Job Category (Administration, Faculty, Exempt Staff, Non-Exempt Staff, and Adjunct Faculty)
Highest and Lowest Ratings – Shows UT’s highest rated statements and UT’s lowest rated statements
Question results by School (Academics) – Shows UT’s Full Data by Question and by Academic School (Business & Communication, Education, Health Sciences, Humanities, Science & Technology, Visual & Performing Arts, Library, and Academic & Community Outreach).